http://www.ahrc.se/new/index.php/src/courts/sub/submit/action/display/id/155
NO MONIES was accepted after judgement by shapiro,,,only wanted to prove his point in court
BOARD REFUSING TO HAND OVER REQUESTED DOCUMENTS.
_________________________________________________________________________________
BOARD GIVING AWAY COMMON AREA LAND WITHOUT VOTE OF ASSOCIATION
BOARD SPENT $40,000 OF ASSOCIATION MONIES TO DEFEND THEIR ACTIONS http://www.ahrc.se/new/index.php/src/courts/sub/lawsuit/action/display/id/107
shapiro spent six years of HIS OWN MONEY to stop the board from giving away common area land owned by ASSOCIATION to individuals to develop WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS via a vote of the membership
Forced into a vote by the ASSOCIATION on two occasions, the ASSOCIATION voted down the measure of allowing common area to be developed by individuals.
shapiro got no monies for his efforts and he could have for the boards malfeaseance.
__________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.ahrc.se/new/index.php/src/tools/sub/yp/action/display/id/1941
SUPERIOR COURT ,,,BOARD hired LAW FIRM and spent $40,000 plus of ASSOCIATION monies to defend their actions of giving away common area ASSOCIATION property and a law firm will represent you if you pay them no matter if they have no case to win.
One day before the civil case to order the ASSOCIATION to stop giving away common area ASSOCIATION property, the law firm hired by the ASSOCIATION capitulated and sent a letter to all the homeowners informing the ASSOCIATION that the ccrs must be abided.
No comments:
Post a Comment